News: What's More Eco? Fake or Fir?

What's More Eco? Fake or Fir?

Think you're more green by going artificial? Think again. The New York Times reports that the most definitive study shows you would have to use your artificial tree for 20 years before it has less impact on the environment than a real tree.

What's More Eco? Fake or Fir?

"'You're not doing any harm by cutting down a Christmas tree,' said Clint Springer, a botanist and professor of biology at Saint Joseph's University in Philadelphia. 'A lot of people think artificial is better because you're preserving the life of a tree. But in this case, you've got a crop that's being raised for that purpose.'

Makers of fake trees argue that the environmental evidence isn't quite so clear-cut.

'If you buy an artificial Christmas tree and reuse it for at least five years, it's absolutely a green thing to do,' said Thomas Harman, founder and chief executive of Balsam Hill, a maker of premium artificial trees. Mr. Harman said that the average amount of car travel by consumers to buy a real Christmas tree outweighed the added energy and pollution costs of buying an artificial tree from China..."

Read more.

Image credit 1, 2.

Be the First to Comment

Share Your Thoughts

  • Hot
  • Latest